This is only a partial truth. For if it were an absolute, it would not be mentioned.
Recording of your art, mandatory in the "mainstream" these days, refers to the use of technological media to act as the "official-izing" agent to art. This is important to understand if you are applying for grants, residencies etc.
The acceptable means of recording for dance is video--continuous footage, then photography.
But to me, this should not define you as a dancer. As an artist, inevitably and supposedly we shape the parameters. I mean, what did we do before photography and film?
At the same time, the new technology of communications and recording has made what used to be the village community, our entire earth. Hence the creation of the Global Dance Project.
However, the real debate, as was pointed out to me by some commie-dancer-artist I had met in Pacifica in 2013, the real debate regards value. It was a fantastic conversation that included my ideas on what I was working on with "Objet d'innocence".
Many outdoor
performances were undocumented. I condensed some Field Notes as support material to those important past
performances, partially in hopes to convey the sense of innovation, artistic process and
dance experience accessed through this type of dance performance. And also, to record
the significant aspects discovered within a "non-conformative" audience, marking
the uniqueness of relationship between dance and interactive audience.
Since 2003, I have been
doing field research and development by means of outdoor performance in the San
Francisco Bay Area. From 2011 to 2013, I did monthly outdoor showings without record other than by the beings (humans local and international, blue heron, ravens, snakes, etc) who paused to observe, or participate or pass by. The impact of the years of outdoor
performing have focused and expanded my understanding of audience, performance and nature.
